ToolStack

Miro vs Wrike

Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026-03-30

Our VerdictMiro wins overall

Miro leads on our composite score — 4.7/5 on G2 vs Wrike's 4.2/5 — but the gap is meaningful at the category level.

Choose Miro if…

Choose Miro if your team focuses on brainstorming and user story mapping and fits a startup, scaleup profile. Starting at $8/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Best-in-class infinite canvas experience — the gold standard for collaborative whiteboarding with real-time multiplayer editing

Choose Wrike if…

Choose Wrike if your team focuses on cross functional project management and marketing campaign management and fits a scaleup, enterprise profile. Starting at $9.8/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Extremely versatile work management platform — supports Gantt, Kanban, table, calendar, and workload views in a single workspace

Miro
by Miro
4.7
out of 5 · 7k+ G2 reviews
Visit Miro ↗
Wrike
by Citrix
4.2
out of 5 · 5k+ G2 reviews
Visit Wrike ↗

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiroWrike
Category
whiteboarding
work_management
G2 Score
4.7 / 5.0Better
4.2 / 5.0
G2 Reviews
6700
4500
Free Tier
Starting Price
$8/user/moBetter
$9.8/user/mo
Mobile App
AI Features
API Access
SSO / SAML
SOC 2
Learning Curve
easy
moderate
Platforms
web, mac, windows, ios, android
web, mac, windows, ios, android

Pros & Cons

Miro

Pros
✓ Best-in-class infinite canvas experience — the gold standard for collaborative whiteboarding with real-time multiplayer editing
✓ Massive template library with 2,500+ community and built-in templates for user story mapping, retrospectives, journey maps, and more
✓ Extremely intuitive interface — new users can be productive in minutes, making it ideal for cross-functional workshops
✓ Excellent facilitation features including voting, timer, attention management, and presentation mode for remote workshops
Cons
✗ Performance can degrade significantly on very large boards with thousands of sticky notes, images, and embedded objects
✗ Free plan limited to only 3 editable boards — previous versions were more generous, which frustrates longtime users
✗ Pricing adds up quickly for large teams since all members need paid seats for full collaboration

Wrike

Pros
✓ Extremely versatile work management platform — supports Gantt, Kanban, table, calendar, and workload views in a single workspace
✓ Powerful resource management and workload balancing with real-time capacity insights (Business plan and above)
✓ Built-in proofing and approval workflows for creative assets — images, videos, PDFs — making it ideal for marketing and creative teams
✓ Strong cross-tagging system allows tasks to live in multiple projects simultaneously without duplication
Cons
✗ Interface can feel overwhelming for new users — the nested folder/project/task hierarchy has a steeper onboarding curve than tools like Asana or Monday.com
✗ Free tier is very limited (5 users only) and most useful features are locked behind Business or Enterprise plans
✗ Lacks native sprint planning and Scrum-specific features — not ideal for engineering-focused agile teams

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your needs. Miro scores 4.7/5 on G2, while Wrike scores 4.2/5. Miro is better for brainstorming and user_story_mapping, while Wrike excels at cross_functional_project_management and marketing_campaign_management.
Miro starts at $8/user/mo per user/month with a free tier. Wrike starts at $9.8/user/mo per user/month with a free tier.
Miro supports 200 integrations, while Wrike supports 400.
Full Miro Review →Full Wrike Review →
Data verified 2026-03-30. Some links may be affiliate links — see disclosure.